Uruguay

AI behavior law: bot and agent disclosure, crawler and training-data rules, automated-agent transactions, and algorithmic decision-making.

0
Instruments
0
Enacted
0
Proposed / in discussion
medium
Confidence

Summary

Uruguay presents moderate-low risk for crawling. Ley 20.327 (2024) — the country's first dedicated cybercrime law — criminalises illicit access to computer data (Art. 297 bis, Penal Code) but, consistent with civil-law tradition, the offence requires bypassing a security mechanism or acting without authorisation; public-page scraping is not the paradigm case. Uruguay holds EU-adequate status under Law 18.331 (2008, recognised EC Decision 2012/484/EU), administered by the URCDP; personal data scraped from public websites is covered and carries no blanket "publicly available" exemption, making privacy the most live risk for PII-heavy crawls. Copyright Law 9.739 (as amended through Law 19.857/2019) uses a narrow closed-list of exceptions — no fair-use doctrine and no TDM exception — so scraping and indexing copyrighted content for AI training is likely infringement. No sui generis database right exists; database protection is limited to compilations meeting the originality threshold. Overall, pure-public-page crawling of non-personal, non-copyrighted government data is tolerable; personal data and copyrighted content require minimisation and caution.

Automated-access legality

Carried forward from the crawler-law index. Governs whether automated clients may access public websites in this jurisdiction.

DimensionValue
Authorization testsecurity mechanism bypass
Public-page carve-outunsettled
Terms-of-service browsewrap enforceablenotice dependent
Terms-of-service clickwrap enforceableyes
Copyright exception modelclosed list
Text and data mining — commercial statusprohibited
Text and data mining — opt-out mechanismnone
robots.txt legal weightnon binding notice
AI training-specific lawnone
Privacy regimeLey 18.331 (LDPD) — EU-adequate
Trespass to chattelsnot recognized

Last reviewed: 2026-05-23. Confidence: medium. Not legal advice.