Ohio
Ohio has enacted laws in two families. The Parental Notification by Social Media Operators Act (2023) requires parental consent for minors under 16 to hold social media accounts; it was permanently enjoined by a federal district court in April 2025, but the Sixth Circuit reversed that ruling on June 18, 2026 and instructed the lower court to enter judgment for the state, so the law is poised to become enforceable once the appellate mandate issues (NetChoice had until July 16, 2026 to seek rehearing). A separate adult content age verification law took effect September 30, 2025, though the Attorney General's office has found most major pornography sites are not complying, citing an interactive-computer-service exemption lawmakers are now working to close.
Subnational jurisdiction. Reviewed 2026-07-15.
HB 96, Internet Age Verification for Obscenity or Material Harmful to Juveniles
Any entity that sells, disseminates, or presents material or a performance that is obscene or harmful to juveniles on the internet must verify that a user, and any person creating an account or subscription, is 18 or older using reasonable methods such as government-issued identification, a commercial age verification system, or transactional data, and must reverify age every two years. The law exempts entities that qualify as interactive computer services under federal law, an exemption the Attorney General says most major pornography sites are relying on to avoid compliance, and which lawmakers were considering narrowing as of early 2026.
- Citation
- Ohio Rev. Code sections 1349.10 and 1349.101
- Status
- In force
- Effective date
- 2025-09-30
- Applies to
- Private sector
- Age threshold
- 18
- Verification methods
- gov id, transactional data, third party service
- Covered services
- Websites and services distributing material obscene or harmful to juveniles, excluding entities that qualify as interactive computer services under federal law
- Penalties
- Injunctive relief sought by the Attorney General after written notice and a 45 day cure period; repeat violations may be pursued without a new cure period.
- Enforcement body
- Ohio Attorney General (exclusive authority)
- Private right of action
- no
- Source
- Ohio Rev. Code sections 1349.10 and 1349.101
HB 33, Parental Notification by Social Media Operators Act
Operators of social media platforms directed to or reasonably expected to be accessed by children must obtain verifiable parental consent, through methods such as a signed form, credit card verification, phone or video call, or government ID, before allowing a child under 16 to create an account. Operators must also disclose available content moderation and parental control features.
- Citation
- Ohio Rev. Code section 1349.09
- Status
- Enjoined
- Effective date
- 2024-01-15
- Applies to
- Private sector
- Age threshold
- 16
- Verification methods
- parental consent, gov id
- Covered services
- Online services, websites, and products that target children or are reasonably expected to be accessed by children
- Penalties
- Civil penalties up to $1,000 per day for the first 60 days of noncompliance, up to $5,000 per day for days 61 through 90, and up to $10,000 per day thereafter.
- Enforcement body
- Ohio Attorney General (exclusive authority)
- Private right of action
- no
- Litigation
- NetChoice, LLC v. Yost, No. 25-3371 (6th Cir.); underlying No. 2:24-cv-00047 (S.D. Ohio), U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, The Act was blocked from its January 15, 2024 start (TRO, then preliminary injunction) and permanently enjoined by the district court on April 16, 2025. On June 18, 2026 the Sixth Circuit reversed in a divided decision, holding NetChoice lacked third-party standing to raise its members' minor users' First Amendment rights and failed to show the Act facially unconstitutional on its own claims, and remanded with instructions to enter judgment for the Attorney General. As of July 15, 2026 the appellate mandate had not yet issued; NetChoice obtained an extension to July 16, 2026 to decide whether to seek panel rehearing or rehearing en banc, so the district court injunction technically remained in place pending the mandate, after which the law is cleared to be enforced.
- Source
- Ohio Rev. Code section 1349.09
Reviewed 2026-07-15. Confidence: medium. Fast-moving area, verify before relying. Not legal advice.